Domestic Violence

The Full Court of the Family Court handed down a landmark decision, In the marriage of Kennon (1977) 22 Fam LR 1, which allowed courts to take into account domestic violence when determining the division of property between partners.

However, the contributions of domestic violence victims will only be taken into account, rather than those of the perpetrator of the violence. The court has discretion to place additional weight on the victim’s contribution. This discretion is only exercised in exceptional circumstances and pursuant to s 79 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

In determining the exceptional circumstances, the court may consider whether one party in a marriage engages in a ‘course of violent conduct’ that has a ‘significant adverse impact’ on their contributions, or which has made their contributions ‘more arduous than they should have been.’ Debate has ensued as to whether these are two separate limbs or whether they are the same principle, expressed in a different way.

Nevertheless, the nexus between the conduct and contribution is quite strict, in that the conduct must have a ‘discernable impact’ upon the contributions of the other party. Indeed, the onus is on the victim to establish this nexus, which has been criticised as being erroneous.

In Stevens v Stevens [2005] FamCA 1304 the notion of in the ‘course of conduct’ was given a wide interpretation to an extent that time-length or repetition are not necessarily determinative. A possible way the conduct of a perpetrator could have a ‘significant adverse impact’ may be ascertained from the psychological and physical distress such conflict inflicts.

The Family Law Council has suggested that the approach in Kennon should be expanded upon, especially to allow the court to consider contributions of the perpetrator, rather than solely the victim.[1] This is often termed as “negative contribution” and would ultimately see less weight placed on contributions made a domestic violence perpetrator. The Full Court of the Family Court in Kennon specifically refused to adopt this approach.

Despite the confusion created by Kennon, the principles espoused by the court continue to be applied; most recently in June 2010 in the case of Whelan v Whelan [2010] FamCA 530.

[1] Family Law Council, Violence and Property Proceedings (14 August 2001) Attorney-General’s Department

Where to now?

Speak to a Family Law Specialist
Often the best way to get the answers you need is to speak to a Specialist.

To contact one of our family law specialist please use our contact form or please call us on +61 3 03 9615 4323.

Book a consultation
A consultation with one of our Family Law Specialists allows you the chance to talk about your family law issue and work with people who deal with these issues on a daily basis.

Also, it gives you the chance to ask any questions that are on your mind and gives us the chance to learn about your situation and what options are open to you

For more information please call us on +61 3 03 9615 4323 or send as an e-mail at We can help you in any situation.

Speak to an Expert Now

Phone: 03 9615 4323 Click here to Email Us

Submit your inquiry below :